Usually, many people know that writing one essay in one term is not good for english writing. First, with one term, writing can be made very simple story. Also, if we contain lots of areas, our thought can be stretched in various ways and we can get many new ideas. So, we can reach to the great conclusion.
However, another thing to consider is that it is good to write one essay in one term. The first reason is that we don’t have much time. As you know, english writing is very hard work. At first, you choose topic and make a thesis sentence and organize outline…. is that all? Maybe not. You should find meterial such as book, magazine, Internet, journal article and so on. Although you write your own essay, it’s not end. You should read and read again or you should ask some feedback your friends. And then, you should rewrite and edit your essay. Like this, english writing takes much time. Hence, I think that one term is not enough time to write two or more essays because we need much time to make perfect essay.
In addition, writing one essay in one term helps us to focus our topics. If we should write two or more essays in one term, we can’t investigate more specific material about our topic because as I mentioned before, we don’t much time. However, If we write only one essay, we can approach our topic deeply, and we can become expert. As you know, the purpose of the english writing is to persuade other people. To persuade other people, we should have many knowledges about our topic. We can provide many examples and explanation about our topic. So, writing one essay in one term is good for english writing.

The Korean government stipulates that candlelight assembly is illegal behavior(reported by Kim Byoung-jo, Chosun newspaper, May 4, 2008). The police says that candlelight assembly about protest in American cow is illegal, so they decided to summon prime movers and investigate them. The Korean civic groups are repelling this measure because they think it violates their human rights. One citizen who is named Park Ji-won says “It is related to our health and the right to live. Government don’t have right to protect this assembly.”
I think candlelight assembly is peaceful demonstration. It doesn’t harmful to the others. Everyone is gathered voluntarily. In addition, the right of freedom is very important. So, what do you think about? Please reference.

President Lee is progressing bill about privatization in medical insurance. This bill is expected to enforce as of October 2008. Privatization in medical insurance is similar to American way. In present, Korean should join healthcare when they are born and government support their medical fee. So, people can be treated for cheaper. However, under the privatization, government don’t control this and people should join private medical company. Also, medical fee is more expensive than now. Of course, privatization in medical insurance causes creating jobs in medical industry and raising their competitive. However, many common people can’t go hospital because of expensive cost.
What do you think about? Is it desirable?

America TSA(Traffic Security Association) installed body perspective machine which called ProVision in LA airport(Chosun newspaper, April 19 2008). This machine will detect people who enter America whether he/she possess arms and bomb. Human Right Conporation protests this behavior. “ProVision detects people’s body contours and underwear. It is violating human rights.” However TSA said “This method is much better than before because we don’t need to touch people personally. We should reinforce anti-terrorism system.”
What’s your opinion? Please reference.

In December 2007, Hye-jin(victim)was disappeared in Anyang. The Anyang police had extensive investigation to find her, but they failed and the case has become wrapped in mystery. After three months, on March 14, 2008, Anyang policer found the Hye-jin’s corpse near the hillock. All koreans shocked by this case and they insisted that murderer should be executed.
The murderer was arrested in police and investigated, but the police didn’t open to the public muderer’s face. Some citizen’s complained about this. One citizen said ” The murderer’s face must be open to the public. We don’t need to protect murderer’s human right. Once murderer’s face is opened, many people know about him and they will protect dangerous situation previously. It will be useful for many people.
But, the other people disagree. “It is true that he is a brutal criminal, but he is a human and all human right should be protected whether he/she is good or bad person.”
What do you think about this? We should respect human right despite murderer? or we don’t have to?
please reference.