I read some book about Media, Media 2.0, written by ex-reporter.  As we welcome the generation of Media 3.0, he indicates some problem about news.  Actually, it was not main point of his book, but I thought seriouly about the part he wrote as problem.  Masters of newspaper company require reporters to be generalist.  They go to the places probably being new items bringing 2 or 3 camera, lap-top, paper and pen,  recorder and car.  They have to be specialist in those parts not only in writing and reporting but also in camera, driving, and computer.  Plus company also require them to write news faster and they post their writings on the Internet.  There is no time to think more, and there is no rest to retouch.  They should only consider speed.  Therefore, the quality of news is getting down.  They even incollect in alphabets.  In this situation, I don’t quite believe our Internet news.  Plus, I want to add one more.  Do you know why our news company have not authorities even though they sell newpapers a lot? Compared to Washington post and Newyork Times,  the number of sell of our news is almost same as them or more.  I think that’s because of the quality. 

I’m rewriting about the incidence which occurred in a week ago.  A week ago, the main issue of Cyworld was about sexual criminal in subway. Here is the news about it http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2887778
(you don’t have to read all, just read last news about phone camera)We can take a photo anywhere regardless of law only except for national secret stuff like army things.  But is it right to take a photo without her allowance? Because there is no exact and directly related law, court said he is innocence.  It can be confused between rights of seeing and taking photos.  But I don’t agree with the court’s decision because there should be a morality.  If court couldn’t punish him, I think his face have to be known to public instead of punishment.  What is your opinion about it?I’d like t discuss more about this problem.